jump to navigation

On Being Critical January 13, 2009

Posted by Mark T. Market in Reflections.
Tags: , , , ,
4 comments

I’ve been spending a great deal of my blogging time on the critical thinker and this was deliberate for me: I needed a venue to ask questions, or more appropriately a venue to learn how to ask questions.

Opening that blog with rickyM, aratron, and receiving feedback and comments from friends and bloggers all over was a welcome experience, since it allowed me to openly explore areas of inquiry I never consciously considered–although many questions have been perennially on the table for me (appearing on an occasional coffee chat, lunch musings, dinner talk, etc.). The fantastic thing for me as a result of this deliberate blogging is that it felt refreshing, almost cathartic, to have those thoughts laid down in a formal manner for other people to see and criticize.

One unexpected benefit of the critical thinker experience is that it had put me in touch with many people who also consider themselves “truth-seekers” and were looking for kindred souls and intellects who not only had the capacity to understand the questions they were (albeit haphazardly) formulating, but had the spiritual fortitude to go ahead and ask them especially when traditional sentiment favored silence.

I was not born a critical thinker, but now having experienced it briefly, I think I was born to be one (and caveat: that it will always be a work in progress).

Which brings me to the more poignant note.

Ever since starting that critical thinker site, I’ve been more and more active in scientific, religious, and philosophical discussions with many parties. One concrete example in particular is a regular study group I’ve been attending with rickyM every week which started out as a book review of ricky’s book: The Force, but has grown to be a forum not only for religion but for critical thinking in general.

I’ve been meeting that group for well into several months now and the discussions have been very varied and entertaining–we simply don’t focus on one topic but allow our minds the freedom to probe and expand in any direction. Just to give a flavor, some of the questions and topics we’ve touched on:

  • Does God evolve?
  • The myth of the given
  • Is unconditional love absolute?
  • What are absolutes?
  • History of theism/God
  • Astrotheology and conspiracy theories
  • Evolution of consciousness

I don’t plan to elaborate on these topics in this post, but only to show the extreme lengths the discussions have taken–and the list is not by any means exhaustive at this point!

One thing the study group has helped leverage for me is that the amount of material between rickyM and myself, the critical thinker blogs, and the videos and documents even on this personal blog have been put to excellent use as research material for the discussions–and I think we’ve only begun to scratch the surface in terms of the kinds of discussions we would like to take. I helped introduce the group to the Zeitgeist videos which were very eye-opening for them, and those represent only 2 of the list of videos I’ve already accumulated on image therapy–clearly a long road full of insights ahead.

And where does this put me? Well even if the amount of research is already piling, I consider this point to only be the beginning of the journey–which is for all intents and purposes a spiritual journey for me. Actually there is another line of thought that logically follows this brief flashback but I’ll save that for the next post–specifically that my foray into the critical thinking blog has just helped set the stage: by providing me with an excellent framework to approach issues, linking me up with like-minded people, and encouraging me to pursue lines of thought I previously never conceived or simply ignored. But a stage is only a stage and the real action is: now that I am learning to think, it will eventually beg the next question, What Do I Want To Think? and more importantly: What Do I Want To Believe?

Like the process of developing a critical mind and approach, adopting a philosophy can’t (and shouldn’t) happen overnight and without due deliberation. In the next post I’m going to try to make furtive steps in that direction.

Time to finally make a stand.

The Four Horsemen – A Roundtable Discussion August 24, 2008

Posted by Mark T. Market in Quotables.
Tags: , , , , , , ,
add a comment

On the 30th of September 2007, Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett, Sam Harris and Christopher Hitchens sat down for a first-of-its-kind, unmoderated 2-hour discussion, convened by RDFRS and filmed by Josh Timonen.

All four authors have recently received a large amount of media attention for their writings against religion – some positive, and some negative. In this conversation the group trades stories of the public’s reaction to their recent books, their unexpected successes, criticisms and common misrepresentations. They discuss the tough questions about religion that face to world today, and propose new strategies for going forward.

Check out this enlightening discussion here.

Blogging On Truth and Critical Thinking August 23, 2008

Posted by Mark T. Market in The List.
Tags: , , ,
add a comment

I’ve teamed up with my friend and fellow blogger, Ricky M. to put together a website on critical thinking. Here we aim to discuss topics from the mundane to the controversial–and attempt to discern the truth behind the fiction.

Check out our new blog at:

http://thecriticalthinker.wordpress.com

It’s obviously still at the infancy stages, but we hope it will garner steam and interest.

We are also opening the blog to contributors who want to share their thoughts and insights on truth regarding everyday matters big and small.

If you want to join the blog, email me at dligot@yahoo.com, or drop a message or comment at the blog itself.

Critical thinkers unite!

Objectivity and Faith In A Banana Republic July 14, 2008

Posted by Mark T. Market in Reflections.
Tags: , ,
add a comment

An interesting article on Inquirer interactive today:

Anti-Life Politicians Must Be Refused Holy Communion

MANILA, Philippines—Catholic politicians who push for abortion should not be allowed to receive Holy Communion because they are “in a situation of sin,” according to a top leader of the Catholic Church.

Interestingly, after a pleasant Sunday night dinner, I was hearing some interesting arguments from my brother (who is finishing his medical internship) about how the population control programme of the Philippine government was non-existent at the moment, and how the Catholic Church contributes to continued ignorance of basic family planning. This assertion was quickly challenged by my own father who cited his own experiences with the now-defunct Population Commission decades ago.

The poor will never learn, my father alleged. No matter how much you provide free contraception to them, they will always remain undisciplined about their affairs. Personally I thought that was a little fatalist, even for a devout Christian. Of course it was late in the night and we were all a little sleepy after our sumptuous dinner.

However, after reading the article above, it got me thinking again. I’m no population expert, and although I know a little about economics, I’m not the authority on public policy. However, although I cede authority on matters of public policy, I retain my stake on critical thinking. And one thing I have realized now more than ever is that the Church has contributed to one thing: it’s ignorance of some realities, the population problem being one.

I do realize that faith and objectivity are antithetical concepts. Objectivity requires validation and proof, while faith remains content on assumptions. This may possibly work on abstract motherhood concepts such as good, evil, sacrifice, damnation, and salvation. But drill down to specific solutions to everyday problems, and faith really has no answers to offer, except perhaps: positive thinking.

Taken into a more specific context: how to deal with a local Church that insists on being politically involved. Politics in itself is already a universe of fallacies and non-sequiturs, and to bring faith into the political arena is inviting quite a disaster–and not just of the intellectual kind.

I have no immediate solutions, at least none that can be accepted both on the grounds of objectivity and faith at the same time.

Meanwhile, here’s another article to ponder on while you mull the idea:

Priest: Catholic Church ‘must’ ask for donations

The Catholic Church doesn’t require donations, especially from the poor, but it “must” ask for offerings as stated in the Bible, a priest said Monday.“We cannot really require those who cannot afford, but it must be requested,” Father Gerry Tapiador, parish priest of the Good Shepherd Cathedral in Novaliches, told ABS-CBN’s morning show, “Umagang Kay Ganda.”